This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Philosophers

Contrast In Mill And Kant’s Philosophical Theories

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

Contrast In Mill And Kant’s Philosophical Theories

Ethics are basically what people choose to be better or worse. These theories deal with values relating to human action according to their ways of life. The best two philosophers dealing with ethics are Kant and Mill. Kant emphasizes deontological ethics, while Mill deals with utilitarianism.

Both theories have differences in that Kant’s theory puts more emphasis on conduct and searching for better deeds at work while Mill’s theory explains the outcome. They are also increasing Happiness of human beings by acting in a way that produces sound for a large number of people. Concerning conception of the good, Kant says that the goodwill results in Happiness and deserving Happiness whereas Mill explains Happiness as the absence of pain. According to Kant, morality is exclusively irrational, while Mill says it is unreasonable (Baron, 1997). Kant says that social context is required for honesty while Mill opposes. Kant focuses on the evaluation of individual agents while Mills deals with collective consequences. (Mills, 2007).

Kant argues that the status of morality is innate while Mill says that it is acquired and cultivated. Besides, Kant argues that the attitude to popular morality is an agreement, But Mill states that it brings the willingness to reform. Lastly, Kant derives the principle of moral action from the agent itself while Mill derives it from the moral correctness of the specific work.

Conclusion

Kantian ethics is better than utilitarianism because it is easier to determine actions to be morally upright. When data are scarce, Kantian theory tends to offer more precision as compared to utilitarianism because one can we can decide if one is being used even in cases where human Happiness is substantial.

Reference

 

 

 

Baron, M. (1997). Kantian ethics. Three methods of ethics, 3-91.

Mills, C. W. (2007). The domination contract. Contract and domination, 79-105.

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask