definition of globalization
Question 1
In the Stanford University Encyclopedia definition of globalization, the focus has been mainly put in explanation of the rudiments of the globalization concepts. It has also emphasized on the discussion of the major disagreements pertaining to the nature of the globalization casual forces. In the first case, globalization has been closely related to deterritoialization, whereby the emphasis here has been on how the geographical location has no impact on the growing variety of the participant’s social activities. In the second case, the definition of globalization has been linked to the interconnectedness of social growth across all existing political and geographical boundaries. In this perception, deterritorialization has been perceived as a close facet in the definition of globalization. In this argument, the majority of human economic activities are based on the strong geographical location; therefore, the crucial facet of globalization concerns the ways through which distant forces and events affect both the regional and local human endeavors. In the third definition of globalization, a close relationship of velocity or speed of human activities has been identified. In this perspective, both interconnectedness and deterritorialization appear to spatial naturally. In the fourth view of globalization, whereby it has been perceived as a long-term process. In this encyclopedia, the triad of interconnectedness, social acceleration, and deterriotorialization hardly feature a sudden activity in social life. The are several points which constitute significantly in the definition of globalization. These points include, deterritorialization, social acceleration, globalization as a multi-pronged process, interconnectedness, a long-term process, and velocity of social activities. The integration of these points in the definition of globalization has given a better understanding of the later.In the Stanford University Encyclopedia definition of globalization, the focus has been mainly put in explanation of the rudiments of the globalization concepts. It has also emphasized on the discussion of the major disagreements pertaining to the nature of the globalization casual forces. In the first case, globalization has been closely related to deterritoialization, whereby the emphasis here has been on how the geographical location has no impact on the growing variety of the participant’s social activities. In the second case, the definition of globalization has been linked to the interconnectedness of social growth across all existing political and geographical boundaries. In this perception, deterritorialization has been perceived as a close facet in the definition of globalization. In this argument, the majority of human economic activities are based on the strong geographical location; therefore, the crucial facet of globalization concerns the ways through which distant forces and events affect both the regional and local human endeavors. In the third definition of globalization, a close relationship of velocity or speed of human activities has been identified. In this perspective, both interconnectedness and deterritorialization appear to spatial naturally. In the fourth view of globalization, whereby it has been perceived as a long-term process. In this encyclopedia, the triad of interconnectedness, social acceleration, and deterriotorialization hardly feature a sudden activity in social life. The are several points which constitute significantly in the definition of globalization. These points include, deterritorialization, social acceleration, globalization as a multi-pronged process, interconnectedness, a long-term process, and velocity of social activities. The integration of these points in the definition of globalization has given a better understanding of the later.In the Stanford University Encyclopedia definition of globalization, the focus has been mainly put in explanation of the rudiments of the globalization concepts. It has also emphasized on the discussion of the major disagreements pertaining to the nature of the globalization casual forces. In the first case, globalization has been closely related to deterritoialization, whereby the emphasis here has been on how the geographical location has no impact on the growing variety of the participant’s social activities. In the second case, the definition of globalization has been linked to the interconnectedness of social growth across all existing political and geographical boundaries. In this perception, deterritorialization has been perceived as a close facet in the definition of globalization. In this argument, the majority of human economic activities are based on the strong geographical location; therefore, the crucial facet of globalization concerns the ways through which distant forces and events affect both the regional and local human endeavors. In the third definition of globalization, a close relationship of velocity or speed of human activities has been identified. In this perspective, both interconnectedness and deterritorialization appear to spatial naturally. In the fourth view of globalization, whereby it has been perceived as a long-term process. In this encyclopedia, the triad of interconnectedness, social acceleration, and deterriotorialization hardly feature a sudden activity in social life. The are several points which constitute significantly in the definition of globalization. These points include, deterritorialization, social acceleration, globalization as a multi-pronged process, interconnectedness, a long-term process, and velocity of social activities. The integration of these points in the definition of globalization has given a better understanding of the later.