Evidence-Based Practice And Clinical Wisdom In Counseling
Choosing between evidence-based practices and clinical wisdom in counseling can be daunting such as where the former is characterized with individualized support, professionalism, and therapist independence. Clinical wisdom supports varied views into issues, and counselors can use their experience to provide better judgment. The benefits of evidence-based practice in counseling include the independence of the therapist, individualized counseling support, and professionalism in counseling support. Therapists are human beings, and they may be affected by their perceptions and experiences during practice (Granello & Young, 2018). Using evidence-based practices implies that therapists who use evidence-based practices can keep their opinions aside and credible methods to assist clients. This ensures professionalism within counseling, where the field leads to regular practices and potential outcomes. Individualized counseling proves necessary in the contemporary world. Granello & Young (2018) postulate that counselors deal with people, and evidence-based interventions mean that they understand the underlying issues best. The cost of dealing with people comes at a hefty price where any mistakes may have devastating impacts, including falling into mental illness. Taking theories and other evidence, then applying them to individual issues in counseling, make them effective than relying on clinical wisdom.
Using clinical wisdom presents its benefits over evidence-based counseling interventions as it gives varied understanding and incorporates the benefit of experience. Clinical wisdom means that counselors can bring in diverse views into practice. Evidence-based practice call for rigid approaches that may not always be applicable (Granello & Young, 2018). For instance, clients are different, and their issues vary. This means that individual counseling is necessary, and this differs from rigid approaches offered by evidence-based counseling. It is in this regard that experience proves critical. Counselors with expertise may be aware of a variety of counseling issues, and this places them in a better position to handle problems. Using clinical wisdom gives one a chance to handle situations better and provide holistic assistance. Therefore, the fluidity associated with clinical wisdom makes it a better option than evidence-based practice in counseling settings. In conclusion, clinical understanding proves to be efficient to practice counseling than evidence-based options because they leverage the benefit of experience and allow dynamic viewing of issues. This is different from evidence-based practice that promotes rigid counseling practices and individualized counseling support.