NON-HAZARDOUS SOLID WASTE GENERATION, DISPOSAL, AND REGULATION IN SAUDI ARABIA

NON-HAZARDOUS SOLID WASTE GENERATION, DISPOSAL, AND REGULATION IN SAUDI ARABIA

1.0. Introduction

In Saudi Arabia, the municipal and waste collection companies are accountable for KSA waste management. But due to urbanization, waste management challenges have become relentless, mostly in major towns such as Jeddah, Riyadh, and Dammam. Waste generation crucial aspect comprises the process or location from which waste originates, the waste generated volume from various waste streams, and the generated waste content. With a populace about 29M, Saud Arabia produces over 15M tons of solid garbage every year[1]. That volume translates to about 1.5 Kg of per person per capita waste generation daily[2].  The unsustainable level defined as the production of non-hazardous waste production, which arises from the rising urbanization and population that has made a massive amount of household solid waste (HSW). Saudi Arabia government deal with challenges of waste gathering, treatment, and disposal with substantial effects on human health and the environment. Likewise, the landfills are exhausted and require expansion to accommodate the rising production of non-hazardous solid waste. Non-hazardous solid garbage is also known as the municipal solid waste, which is any non-liquid waste, generated by an individual, household, institution, or small business. The waste usually made and disposed of regularly and mainly comprised of uneaten food and papers. Household solid waste (HSW) is regarded as a municipal solid waste (MSW) type and consists mostly of metals, plastics, wood, paper, organics, glass, and others. All the rubbishes should be disposed of correctly to help preserve ecological attributes and human health, and likewise preserving natural resources[3]. HSW has both direct and ancillary impacts on ecological and human wellbeing. Direct results vary from materials harm and aesthetic loss significant to human health harm, hence creating substantial socio-economic effects. Indirect impacts are mostly long-standing impacts that differ from one alteration in ecosystem framework and actions to the climate variation, which, therefore, will impact the socio-economy and the region’s sustainability.

Therefore, this thesis engages in two research questions in evaluating non-hazardous waste generation . The first is related to the various laws and approaches used in waste administration are pegged on the globally accepted scientific method for cohesive waste management pyramid. But the challenge lies in functional performance. The second has a link to the current waste management practices that promote environmental protection and sustainability. The research question that this thesis seeks to answer is;

1. What was read from examining the existing legal frameworks and implementation rules related to waste management, particularly considering the rising urbanization and population, causing a rise in solid waste production? In asking this question, it helps in determining how, and under what circumstances, reliable and robust legal frameworks can be used in achieving greater sustainability and ecological innovation in waste disposal and management in Saudi Arabia, and suggest suitable management processes to promote MSW management, which will eventually improve environmental protection.

PART 2 of this thesis, analysis of the type of sources and volume of Non-hazardous    Solid Waste Generated in Saudi Arabia.

PART 3 factors That Contribute to the Generation of Non-hazardous Solid Waste.

                  PART 4 of this thesis, describe The Current Legal Challenge Approach to Managing                           Non-hazardous Solid Waste.

                    PART 5 Illustrate Current Waste Management Practices in KSA.

PART 6 describe in-depth the Modern Methods in Waste Management Practices in Saud Arabia through discussion and analysis of Anaerobic Digestion diagram: Changing from Discarding to Engineered Landfill Structure, Change of Methane into Liquid Fuel as well as Pyrolysis. Also, Changing Plastic Waste into Liquid Energy, analysis of Pyrolysis Value-added Products, Catalytic Pyrolysis, and Importance on Saudi Arabia Natural Zeolite.

2.0. Analysis of the Type of Sources and Volumes of Non-hazardous Solid Waste Generated in Saudi Arabia

MSW composition gotten at waste dumping locations relies on the source and communities and significantly fluctuates from town to town. Typically, MSW comprises of organics as the main component at 40% of which food waste in the foremost waste stream at 50.6%[4]. The second biggest MSW stream is plastics at 5-17%[5]. But other elements are likewise present in the waste stream, which comprise minerals/metals (8.1%), textile (6.4%), glass (4.6%), and organic materials 65.5 %[6]. Industrial wastes averagely generated 2.8M tonnes yearly, and household produced roughly 2.75 M tons of MSW in 2015[7].

Saudi Arabia produces 15M tons of MSW yearly, with per capita per person of around 1.4 to 1.8 kg every year[8]. By 2033, Saudi Arabia’s generation of non-hazardous solid waste expected doubling to about 30 million tons per year[9]. The major components of MSW are food waste, which accounts for 40 to 50 per cent of all non-hazardous solid wastes. Paper is another common constituent of non-hazardous solid waste, amounting to about 27 per cent of the total municipal solid waste^[10]. Plastics also constitute a significant portion of Saudi Arabia’s solid waste stream. In the major cities, non-hazardous plastic waste represents about 15% of the municipal waste[11]. Other components of the non-hazardous solid waste stream in Saudi Arabia include textiles (6 per cent of the total waste stream), wood (8 per cent), and glass (5 per cent)^[12]. Notably, Saudi Arabia is ranked first in the world in terms of food wastage. Out of the total food produced in the country, 30 per cent is a waste in accordance to many dinner parties, weddings, and Ramadan celebrations[13].

The country also has the highest consumption of grains worldwide, whereby every citizen consumes about 158Kg every year compared to a global average of 145Kg of grain consumption per person. It causes food wastage, for example, rice, bakery products, fats, and meat[14].  Per capita, food waste in Saudi Arabia is 250Kg per head yearly compared to plastics, which amounts to about 8.3 million tons of wasted food every year[15]. KSA has inadequate arable lands and scarce water resources in supporting mass-production agriculture and feeding its rising populace, hence KSA depends on imports and subsidized foods in meeting its needs[16]. Waste is typical in celebrations and special occasions where the habit is providing excess food than needed, for example, amid Ramadan.  Food waste has adverse effects on the atmosphere as a leading landfill contributor. The KSA government makes food items accessible to its populace as extremely subsidized rates, which explains the food waste of 250Kg of yearly food waste per capita[17]. In the city of Riyadh, there is a municipal substantial waste crisis given that the city is exceeding 8 million tons every year^[18].  It implies that Riyadh city has waste challenges because of due to rapid urbanization that poses rising volumes of wastes generated. Riyadh city with a population of 5.3 million, makes a volume of 2800×103 tons of solid waste per year[19]. Plastics, which are the second most abundant solid wastes, are on the rise during the holy month of Ramadan and Hajj whereby a large amount of plastic garbage in terms of containers and bags for drinks and food are disposed off.

3.0. Factors That Contribute to the Generation of Non-hazardous Solid Waste

In KSA, the non-hazardous collection services are facing problems like rising population growth, alteration inhabits, and absence of awareness on the effects of solid garbage in the ecosystem. KSA witnessed a quick population expansion, industrialization, and urbanization in the last few years, out-coming in the generation of massive solid garbage[20]. The average population rise was recorded at 3.4% in the last four decades, while urbanization rose for eighty per cent of the entire populace in the 1970s to present[21]. The circumstance has promoted the massive problem of unsupervised solid waste production where it generates massive waste in the eight main cities. The MSW production in KSA is 15.3 Mt/y with an approximated proportion of 1.4 kg/capita/d[22].

Saudi Arabia Kingdom (KSA) is among the promising economies of the Arab world. Conservatively, the municipal mandates and waste gathering organizations are accountable for KSA waste management[23]. However, because of urbanization, waste management challenges have become relentless, mostly in major towns such as Jeddah, Riyadh, and Dammam, and it is among the substantial problems for municipal authorities[24]. Presently, Saudi Arabia’s government engages primarily with the challenge by endorsing a systematized structure in the region and likewise a fostered tactic for waste supervision[25]. Several laws and approaches permitted for waste administration sare pegged on the globally acceded scientific method for a cohesive waste supervision pyramid. But the challenge lies in functional implementation.

Solid garbage management is a multidimensional problem urban establishments face. Municipal authorities are mostly the accountable organizations for robust waste gathering and discard. The MSW capacity generated yearly is rising quickly because of population development, global urbanization, agile development, and economic growth. In KSA, MSW gathering services are facing a rising number of challenges like increasing population rise habits changes and the absence of mindfulness of the effect of solid waste on the atmosphere[26]. The theme of reliable garbage treatment is amongst the most crucial matters that were endorsed by the League of Arabian nations in 2008[27]. The league implores researchers to make project bids for reliable garbage administration at the national level in the Arab region. Likewise, a cohesive technique for hazardous materials management and waste should be under execution. Inappropriate MSW management triggers hazards to residents for its vital role in environmental pollution.

4.0. The Current Legal Challenge Approach to Managing Non-hazardous Solid Waste

KSA has a whole legal structure for waste management. The general ecological regulations and solid waste law determine the leading roles for waste management and the national environmental standards outlined in detail and offer precise guidelines for waste supervision that safeguards human health and environment[28]. The environmental rules established in 2001 act as the overall parameter for all private and public organizations in Saudi Arabia. MODON was launched in 2001 ad presently; it is managing thirty-five industrial cities that are either in operation or under development[29]. The authority uses the environmental rules and guidelines outlined by GAMEP, which it executes via inspection, leases, and penalties.

The challenges are the effective regulations enforcement and the requirement for clarity in the roles and tasks of institutions concerning waste management. Saudi Arabia MSW regulation management depends mostly on the private waste management business expertise and responsibilities[30]. The kingdom tried to promote waste management industry growth to reduce the waste management cost for MSW operators and advance the entire waste management practice expertise. All processing and dumping sites must be EPA licensed, and all waste management firms should be licensed[31]. The law comprises civil and criminal fines for inappropriate waste management actions.

MSW discard and management continues to offer substantial challenges for Saudi Arabia. Among the causes are the absence of legal prosecution and fines and waste management companies’ corrupt practices. The 1998 rules and the 2001 law were controlling MSW management mirror the fundamental legal structures in industrial nations[32]. Economic mechanisms such as pricing should be adopted to raise the products and services prices linked to waste management hence promoting more productive and efficient habits that reduce impacts on environmental pollution[33]. In the MSW context, pricing could take several forms. Tariffs could be executed MSW that is recyclable, resulting in less MSW in the waste stream[34]. Disposal costs of treated MSW into landfills can likewise be raise hence increasing the waste management businesses’ costs and out-coming in a more productive waste management habit.

The regulatory structure in Saudi Arabia can likewise raise public charges in ensuring more productive and efficient management habits[35]. For instance, utility charges for landfill use and public waste supervision should be enough in covering these municipal operations costs, which vary pegged I the usage amount by the private operator, hence promoting more efficient waste management actions. Since Saudi Arabia landfills are functioning in excess capacity, such charges can likewise be underutilization in collecting revenues for landfill expansion.

Charges can be introduced to empower landfill operators, which are the primary air-borne pollutants for MSW, to reduce or stop operations. These charges are peg on recognizing discharged pollutants and then establishing a fee equal to the said pollutants estimated discharge. These charges create monetary incentives amongst polluters to embrace more sustainable technologies and structures.

5.0. Current Waste Management Practices in KSA

The present MSW management system in KSA is a modest habit that comprises assemblage and discarding in a landfill site. Several solid wastes in big towns are discarding similarly. For example, the Makkah landfill waste that is dump is averagely 1800-2000 tons/day in typical days. In contrast, amid Ramadhan, the waste quantity rises to 3000[36]. Solid waste in Jeddah is gathering via sizeable bins put all around the industrial and suburban places[37]. The accumulated rubbish is first to take to the transfer locations, and they eventually decided to the dumping site. The Buraiman, Jeddah landfill facility gets averagely 1.5M tons of solid waste yearly and 4500 tons/daily amid Hajj[38] . Figure 1 depicts a synopsis of the hierarchy of waste management for several technologies regarding their ecological and economic results.

Currently, several KSA dumping sites establish landfills, which means that a significant portion of garbage discard ad will attain the landfill size in coming years.   The dumping of other waste forms like wastewater mud is likewise posturing challenges of odour, methane production, and other health risks[39]. The waste dumping without concocted landfill structure is an old practice performed in KSA. It triggers several ecological risks. For instance, the absence of a gas gathering structure trigger methane discharges into the air directly. When landfill areas attain their capacity and cannot utilize for other uses such as building construction and so forth since dumping land takes several years for settlement because of continuous squalor of organic garbage under the ground.

In Saudi Arabia, MSW is gathered from personal or community rubbish bin and discarded off in landfills or dumpsites. MSW comprises of plastic bags, food garbage, used tires, yard garbage, furniture scrap, waste paper, and home appliances. In KSA, presently, 10-15% of this litter is re-used, whereas the residual goes to landfill[40]. Waste reusing is a range of activities that comprise; waste materials gathering and sorting. These materials processing to generate new products and buying the usage of this new stuff by clients. Reusing assists in protecting the environment, conserving limited resources, enhancing energy production, building a strong economy, and building communities. Recycling assumes a vital task in decreasing litter amounts, reverting funds to use, and reducing the monetary and ecological MSW management burden. A widespread partly tiered structure exists for garbage recycling in every city, integrating scavengers, prominent recyclers, small household/business recyclers, and manufacturers to generate recycled products.

Organic materials are the most common household wastes. This garbage can be re-used and utilized as natural fertilizers for repossession of the community’s new desert lands. It will limit the importation costs of fruits and vegetables from other nations massively. Likewise, these natural organic manures can be utilized for tree planting to produce furniture woods. Also, the re-use of organic household waste should decrease greenhouse gas discharge from waste [41]. For instance, in Jeddah City, papery residue signifies the other prevalent household solid garbage, ad these massive waste paper amounts can be re-used and utilized as a source of packaging paper mills. Re-used paper with virgin mash to generate mostly packaging paper[42].

Organic garbage substances from the domestic bases of Jeddah City can be changed into productive energy types like bi-hydrogen, biogas, and bio-alcohols via garbage to energy methods for universal sustainable growths. Biomass energy can assume a crucial task in decreasing greenhouse gas discharge. The biomass used for energy counterbalances, fossil fuel, greenhouse gas discharge. It has been approximate that the aggregate biomass energy KSA latent is 3.0[43]. In Saudi Arabia, garbage landfill preserves to be the crucial technique of MSW discarding. Massive new waste administration facilities have launched, and the mechanical-biological pre-treatment role in waste management anticipated to become more prevalent in the temporary. Pre-treatment will have extensive inferences for the waste description that disposed of to landfills and, therefore, a method in which landfills should be managed[44]. Mechanical-biological pre-processing typically comprise sorting to eliminate re-usable, mechanical particle scope decrease, and half-done bio-degradable, which might attain via either anaerobic breakdown or aerobic composting procedure. The long-standing conduct of mechanically organically processed litter in landfills will be unalike from that of untreated MSW owing to the elimination and decrease of particular garbage proportions amid the mechanical.

5.1. ArRiyadh Waste Management: Case Study

ArRiyadh city produces over fifty million tons of projected waste yearly.

The Alsulay landfill itself does comprise some engineering; however, it is not functional to global standards. There are likewise no procedures in place to sidetrack biodegradable materials from the landfill, which has the likelihood of pollution and long-haul greenhouse gas production. Demolition, construction, and quarry waste (C &D) denote the massive percentage by mass of ArRiyadh’s waste. These waste substances mainly contain inert elements like debris and soils.

However, this waste stream likewise comprises non-hazardous substances like plastics, tyres, and wood and likely harmful materials like oils, asbestos, and chemicals[45]. Most of the city’s C& D wastes are unlawfully discarded in vacant plots and on the city’s streets. Over ten million tons of C&D wastes dumping occurs illegally in the town. Formally disposed wastes sare tipped at the Amanah’s dumpsite at Alghanmiah and Alnadhim, one on several privately managed dumpsite in the city[46]. Or tipped at illegal dumpsites in the city’s Wadi area. These discarding locations are functioned with either no or very restricted regulations and checks over the accepted wastes nature, causing inaccurate wastes discarded at these sites[47]. For example, tyres, wood, and furniture disposal at these sites are widespread. These sites likewise lack engineering regulations, implying that any gaseous production  discharged into the environment, likely instigating pollution[48]. Mostly Alnadhim has historically been utilized for mixed waste disposal and so can probably posture a substantial pollution danger.

Most of ArRiyadh’s solid non-hazardous commercial and industrial (C&I) waste are amassed by private contractors or placed in municipality roadside containers with MSW and discarded in Alslay landfill. Saudi Manufacturing Property Corporation (MODON) run a wastewater treatment plant at its industrial city 2 in ArRiyadh. The remaining are containerized and operated by private division waste management organizations as proxies for private manufacturing operators. In some situations, this implies that organizations stockpile wastes until enough volumes are amassed for the private sector to convey and treat at treatment facilities owned by a third party[49]. Non-hazardous liquid and C&I wastes are purified at Manfouha and Heet sewerage treatment plants. But these locations are under significant strain and; hence several industrial facilities are either amassing their liquid wastes or relocating them to private waste operatives for treatment or disposal in the city outskirts.

ArRiyadh lacks hazardous waste treatment volume. Some hazardous wastes are conveyed 400km to Jubail hazardous waste facility. Harmful liquid emission discharge likewise has taken outside ArRiyadh, 85km to AlKharg treatment centre, whereas others are co-disposed with solid garbage in Alnadhim dumpsite. But unlawful C&I wastes tipping both hazardous and non-hazardous is prevalent with hazardous garbage mostly dumped unlawfully because of the substantial transporting cost away from the city[50]. Some C&I waste substances recycling is well -established in ArRiyadh. For example, waste oils, cardboards, and materials. But there is scope for raising the materials recycled types and quantity.

Most of the city’s healthcare wastes are non-hazardous, containing garbage produced by catering, administrative, and daily maintenance functions. Private contractors collect healthcare garbage for treatment at the city’s only autoclave facility before discard at the Alsulay landfill. Every hospital tenders its waste management contracts distinctly, however, managed by the health ministry. ArRiyadh city produces averagely 800,000m3 sewage daily, which is presently treated at Heet, Alhair, and Manfouha sewage processing plants[51]. In 2020, there is planning on another new plant in Ban Ban with an anticipated 300,000m3 capacity[52]. Most of the sludge is presently solar-dried in the Al Hair wastewater processing plant facility in a mainly uncontrolled manner and then stockpiled. Likewise, lightly polluted sewage waters tapped off from sewage sludge are utilized for dust concealment at Alghanmiah dumpsite.

6.0. Modern Methods in Waste Management Practices in Saud Arabia

MSW  pis regarded as substantial energy and valuable product source. There are massive revenues linked with stable litter and are indubitable for the nation like KSA. As the present action in KSA is not efficient for robust waste resources recovery, some initiatives have to adopt in Saudi Arabia[53]. Under the deliberation of garbage structure and energy necessity in KSA, the stress is providing to the machinery like anaerobic absorption and pyrolysis. The widespread food ingestion and depletion trigger excessive macrobiotic substances in MSW for which anaerobic breakdown is the most functional expertise. Likewise, pyrolysis is a clever technique for plastic trash transformation to liquid fuel since plastic garbage is the second most significant element of MSW. Because of extreme disposable items consumption mostly in Madina and Makkah cities where several pilgrims come yearly from other nations[54]. The challenge linked with modern technologies and the benefits of changing from old habits to new technologies is abridging in fig 3.

6.1. Anaerobic Digestion: Changing from Discarding to Engineered Landfill Structure

Presently the focus has risen towards anaerobic digestion expertise use for reliable organic garbage treatment. It is because of new and stern rules development for secure organic garbage disposal and desire for substitute energy sources to diminishing fossil fuels. Anaerobic digestion is characteristics to bacterial natural materials degradation and balance under the oxygen-free situation, which triggers solid biomass and biogas production[55]. It is safe organic garbage treatment as it offers the alternative of a secure, eco-friendly discard of garbage with extra-economic advantages. As the biogas methane content comprises seventy per cent, so it is usable as renewable energy sources that are affordable as contrasted to the traditional fossil fuels. Also, energy retrieved from solid garbage is ecologically secure as no other GHG discharge are linking to anaerobic breakdown.

A simple practice is useful in managing MSW in KSA through gathering and discarding into landfill. These landfills aren’t an engineered landfill framework and don’t have leachate and gas gathering infrastructure as evident in Makkah landfill location. The waste dumping into landfills develops several issues like bad smells and leachate, which might trigger Naissance and groundwater contamination[56]. Also, because of anaerobic squalor in a landfill, methane discharge might contribute to additional global warming in the atmosphere. The dump provides unmatched energy resources in methane gas form if this possibility in use to substitute the fossil fuel demands and reduce carbon dioxide discharge. KSA has 2,250,000 km² total area with fallow and desert land[57]. There is no land rarity to use for landfill system expansion. Given the massive substantial waste generation amount yearly, its useful to explore the methane potential as a likely supplement to the present energy mix. The biogas generated amid anaerobic breakdown cannot serve as a fuel in its real arrangement.

6.2. Change of Methane into Liquid Fuel

The biogas cannot serve used as fuel utilizing up-gradation methods. But these procedures are ordinarily costly ad make the methane application inefficient[58]. Likewise, other issues linked with methane comprise challenges in storing and transportation since methane is present in a vaporous condition at ambient temperature. These challenges a tackling o the changing methane to methanol, which is a useful product and can be utilized as liquid energy by turning into olefins and gasoline. Several techniques have been reported to methane conversion to methanol comprising thermo-chemical, biological change using methanotrophs, and non-thermal plasma[59].

In the thermochemical procedure, methane can be resourcefully in changing to methanol. However, the system is costly because of the metal catalysts’ prerequisite and high temperature. Also, the thermochemical system becomes ineffectual when methane biogas has impurities. Equally, biological alteration techniques are more feasible and ecologically friendly[60]. The technology selection is crucial to the usage of the methane potential either by the change to methanol. In the KSA case, there is a massive ingesting of liquid energy in transportation[61]. The methanol as liquid energy can effortlessly be managed and changed to other petroleum energies for its extensive use like conveyance.

6.3. Pyrolysis: Changing Plastic Waste into Liquid Energy

In KSA, 15.3M tons of municipal waste is generated yearly, which comprise seventeen per cent of plastic. Plastic is non-biodegradable and therefore strays for an extended period in the environment.  These waste disposal by landfill or burning might trigger environmental and health issues. Also, in KSA, several plastic litters are discarded with MSW in a landfill. Also, traditional recycling methods re-use only a little percentage of plastic garbage[62]. Under these situations, several wastes to energy methods like gasification and pyrolysis are becoming researchers’ focus as an option for plastic waste processing.

Pyrolysis is a tertiary re-use method prevalently utilized for plastic waste thermal conversion at different temperatures varying from 300oC to 900oC[63]. Plastic garbage pyrolysis is performed in oxygen absence, creating vapours and char. Gases discharged amid pyrolysis are changed into liquid energy by compression procedure. The procedure takes roughly three to four hours to shift plastic litter into liquid fuel[64]. The pyrolysis procedure enhanced by utilizing catalyst in reducing the temperature and retaining process time. In pyrolysis technology, several pyrolytic reactors are useful to diverse scholars. There are a one-phase reactor and two-phase pyrolysis reactors. In the one-phase reactor, the feedstock is combined with a catalyst in a similar reactor, whereas in the two-phase reactor, the reheating and catalytic reactors detach. On a substrate feeding basis, there are two reactors categories, which are pre-feeding and post-feeding.

6.4. Pyrolysis Value-added Products

Pyrolysis’s main energy product is liquid fuel. Using pyrolysis, 74-84% of plastic changes into fluid energy. Liquid fuel created from pyrolysis has similar charges to diesel regarding cold discharge attributes, viscosity, and density. Hence it has a substantial possibility to be utilized as a conventional diesel alternative[65]. Thickness is a crucial fuel attribute and depends on the feedstock structure. Char is an uncharred plastic leftover in the reactor after pyrolysis process completion. It’s the procedure by-product and can be utilized as wastewater processing adsorbed. Char with extreme BET surface zone, small size, and less reduced scope has the likelihood to be used as adsorbent I various ecological usages like heavy metals removal from wastewater.

6.5. Catalytic Pyrolysis: Importance on Saudi Arabia Natural Zeolite

Catalytic pyrolysis is a significant method to change plastic into extreme quality liquid energy and other value-added items like char and vapours. Catalyst promoted the pyrolysis procedure efficacy by reducing the temperature and preservation time, eliminating impurities, and changing hydrocarbon into gasoline. The catalyst usage makes the procedure extraordinarily economical and likewise promoted liquid fuel quality[66]. Catalysts utilized for pyrolysis procedures are acidic.  In KSA Natural zeolite (NZ) is a standard in Harrat Shama and Jabbal Shama areas. It has an extreme BET surface scope with a crystalline framework ad can be utilized as a reagent in various garbage to energy ground. The Saudi Arabian use of natural zeolite can be an exceptional alternative for promoting the pyrolysis procedure efficiency for the processing of massive plastic waste amounts. The NZ usage will improve both liquid fuel quality and likewise make the procedure extremely economical because of local abundance.

To enhance the catalyst activities, there are various modification methods accessibly by which the natural zeolite catalytic efficiency can likewise be improved. Alteration can operate through thermal activation, acid leaching, and metal doping using wet impregnation. Thermal catalyst activation at 550^oC eliminates the volatile compounds from the catalyst, whereas acid leaching rises catalyst acidity and removes internal catalyst impurities. Also, metals dropping alters the enzyme. Metal site presence can promote hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions. Therefore, dual operations make it more widespread in utilizing it as a catalyst in the catalytic pyrolysis.

Bibliography

Abatzoglou, Nicolas, and Steve Boivin. “A review of biogas purification processes.” Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Biorefining 3, no. 1 (2009): 42-71.

Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

Al-Hadlaq, Abdullah, Zayed Ali Huneitib, and Wamadeva Balachandranc. “Bio-Medical Waste Handling and Management in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.” International Journal 4, no. 6 (2013).

Alhumoud, Jasem M. “Municipal solid waste recycling in the Gulf Co-operation Council states.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 45, no. 2 (2005): 142-158.

Alhumoud, Jasem M., Ibrahim Al-Ghusain, and Hamad Al-Hasawi. “Management of recycling in the Gulf Co-operation Council states.” Waste Management 24, no. 6 (2004): 551-562.

Anjum, Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar. “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia.” Appl. Agric. Biotechnol 1 (2016): 13-26.

Baig, Mirza B., Khodran H. Al-Zahrani, Felicitas Schneider, Gary S. Straquadine, and Marie Mourad. “Food waste posing a serious threat to sustainability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia–A systematic review.” Saudi journal of biological sciences (2018).

Chen, Dezhen, Lijie Yin, Huan Wang, and Pinjing He. “Pyrolysis technologies for municipal solid waste: a review.” Waste management 34, no. 12 (2014): 2466-2486.

Cheremisinoff, Nicholas P. Handbook of solid waste management and waste minimization technologies. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003.

Dijkema, G. P. J., M. A. Reuter, and E. V. Verhoef. “A new paradigm for waste management.” Waste management 20, no. 8 (2000): 633-638.

Esposito, G., L. Frunzo, A. Giordano, F. Liotta, A. Panico, and F. Pirozzi. “Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes.” Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 11, no. 4 (2012): 325-341.

Ge, Xumeng, Liangcheng Yang, Johnathon P. Sheets, Zhongtang Yu, and Yebo Li. “Biological conversion of methane to liquid fuels: status and opportunities.” Biotechnology advances 32, no. 8 (2014): 1460-1475.

Hakami, Bader A., and El-Sayed Sedek Abu Seif. “Household solid waste composition and management in Jeddah City, Saudi Arabia: a planning model.” Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci 4, no. 1 (2015): 1-10.

Hofmann, Pascale. “Wasted waste—Disappearing reuse at the peri-urban interface.” Environmental science & policy 31 (2013): 13-22.

Jamradloedluk, Jindaporn, and Chaloenporn Lertsatitthanakorn. “Characterization and utilization of char derived from fast pyrolysis of plastic wastes.” In Advanced Materials Research, vol. 931, pp. 849-853. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2014.

Khan, Hasin U., Tahir Husain, and Suhail M. Khan. “Solid waste management practices in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.” Environmental Management 11, no. 6 (1987): 729-734.

Khan, Muhammad Sadiq Munfath, and Zakariya Kaneesamkandi. “Biodegradable waste to biogas: renewable energy option for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” Int. J. Innov. Appl. Stud 4, no. 1 (2013): 101-113.

Kjeldsen, Peter, Morton A. Barlaz, Alix P. Rooker, Anders Baun, Anna Ledin, and Thomas H. Christensen. “Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review.” Critical reviews in environmental science and technology 32, no. 4 (2002): 297-336.

Mandeli, Khalid Nasralden. “The realities of integrating physical planning and local management into urban development: A case study of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.” Habitat International 32, no. 4 (2008): 512-533.

Nizami, A., Mohammad Rehan, Omar KM Ouda, Khurram Shahzad, Yumna Sadef, Tariq Iqbal, and Iqbal MI Ismail. “An argument for developing waste-to-energy technologies in Saudi Arabia.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 45 (2015): 337-342.

Nizami, A., Mohammad Rehan, Omar KM Ouda, Khurram Shahzad, Yumna Sadef, Tariq Iqbal, and Iqbal MI Ismail. “An argument for developing waste-to-energy technologies in Saudi Arabia.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 45 (2015): 337-342.

Ouda, Omar KM, Huseyin M. Cekirge, and Syed AR Raza. “An assessment of the potential contribution from waste-to-energy facilities to electricity demand in Saudi Arabia.” Energy Conversion and Management 75 (2013): 402-406.

Ouda, Omar KM, S. A. Raza, A. S. Nizami, M. Rehan, R. Al-Waked, and N. E. Korres. “Waste to energy potential: a case study of Saudi Arabia.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 61 (2016): 328-340.

Panda, Achyut K., Raghubansh K. Singh, and D. K. Mishra. “Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel: A suitable method for plastic waste management and manufacture of value-added products—A world perspective.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, no. 1 (2010): 233-248.

Schott, Anna Bernstad Saraiva, Henrik Aspegren, Mimmi Bissmont, and Jes la Cour Jansen. Modern Solid Waste Management in Practice: The City of Malmö Experience. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

Tolba, Mostafa Kamal, and Najib Saab, eds. “Arab environment: future challenges.” Beirut: Arab Forum for Environment and Development, 2008.

Troschinetz, Alexis M., and James R. Mihelcic. “Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries.” Waste management 29, no. 2 (2009): 915-923.

Wilson, David C., Costas A. Velis, and Ljiljana Rodic. “Integrated sustainable waste management in developing countries.” In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 52-68. Thomas Telford, 2013.

[1] Ouda Omar KM, S. A. Raza, A. S. Nizami, M. Rehan, R. Al-Waked, and N. E. Korres, “Waste to energy potential: a case study of Saudi Arabia.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 61 (2016), 328-340

[2] Anjum Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar, “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia.” Appl. Agric. Biotechnol 1 (2016), 13-26

[3] Anjum, Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar. “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia.” Appl. Agric. Biotechnol 1 (2016): 13-26.

[4] Ouda, Raza, Nizami, Rehan, Al-Waked, and Korres,” Waste to energy potential,” 342.

[5] Ouda, Raza, Nizami, Rehan, Al-Waked, and Korres,” Waste to energy potential,” 342.

[6] Anjum Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar.          “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia,” 15

[7] Anjum Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar.          “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia,” 15

[8] Ouda, Raza, Nizami, Rehan, Al-Waked, and Korres,” Waste to energy potential,” 342.

[9], Anjum Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar,         “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia,” 17.

[10] Anjum Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar,         “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia.” Appl. Agric. Biotechnol 1 (2016), 13-26,

[11] Ouda, Raza, Nizami, Rehan, Al-Waked, and Korres,” Waste to energy potential,” 342.

[12] Ouda, Raza, Nizami, Rehan, Al-Waked, and Korres,” Waste to energy potential,” 342.

[13] Baig, Al-Zahrani, Schneider, Straquadine, & Mourad, “Food waste posing a serious threat,” 65

[14] Baig, Al-Zahrani, Schneider, Straquadine, & Mourad, “Food waste posing a serious threat,” 65.

[15]. Mirza Baig., Khodran H. Al-Zahrani, Felicitas Schneider, Gary S. Straquadine, and Marie Mourad, “Food waste posing a            serious threat to sustainability in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia–A systematic review.” Saudi Journal of Biological       Sciences (2018), 60.

[16] Baig, Al-Zahrani, Schneider, Straquadine, & Mourad, “Food waste posing a serious threat,” 65

[17] Baig, Al-Zahrani, Schneider, Straquadine, & Mourad, “Food waste posing a serious threat,” 65

[18] Anjum Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar.         “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia.” Appl. Agric. Biotechnol 1 (2016), 13-26.

[19] Baig, Al-Zahrani, Schneider, Straquadine, & Mourad, “Food waste posing a serious threat,” 65

[20] Ouda, Omar KM, Huseyin M. Cekirge, and Syed AR Raza. “An assessment of the potential contribution from waste-to-energy    facilities to electricity demand in Saudi Arabia.” Energy Conversion and Management 75 (2013): 402-406.

[21] Ouda, Omar KM, Huseyin M. Cekirge, and Syed AR Raza. “An assessment of the potential contribution from waste-to-energy    facilities to electricity demand in Saudi Arabia.” Energy Conversion and Management 75 (2013): 402-406.

[22] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[23] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[24] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[25] Ouda, Omar KM, Huseyin M. Cekirge, and Syed AR Raza. “An assessment of the potential contribution from waste-to-energy    facilities to electricity demand in Saudi Arabia.” Energy Conversion and Management 75 (2013): 402-406.

[26] Anjum Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar, “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia,” 19.

[27] Khan, Hasin U., Tahir Husain, and Suhail M. Khan. “Solid waste management practices in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia.” Environmental Management 11, no. 6 (1987): 729-734.

[28] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[29] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[30] Cheremisinoff, Nicholas P. Handbook of solid waste management and waste minimization technologies. Butterworth-  Heinemann, 2003.

[31] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[32] Ouda, Omar KM, S. A. Raza, A. S. Nizami, M. Rehan, R. Al-Waked, and N. E. Korres. “Waste to energy potential: a case            study of Saudi Arabia.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 61 (2016): 328-340.

[33] Troschinetz, Alexis M., and James R. Mihelcic. “Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries.”              Waste management 29, no. 2 (2009): 915-923.

[34] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[35] Tolba, Mostafa Kamal, and Najib Saab, eds. “Arab environment: future challenges.” Beirut: Arab Forum for Environment and      Development, 2008.

[36] Nizami, A., Mohammad Rehan, Omar KM Ouda, Khurram Shahzad, Yumna Sadef, Tariq Iqbal, and Iqbal MI Ismail. “An            argument for developing waste-to-energy technologies in Saudi Arabia.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 45      (2015): 337-342.

[37] Hakami Bader A., and El-Sayed Sedek Abu Seif, “Household solid waste composition and management in Jeddah City, Saudi      Arabia: a planning model.” Int. Res. J. Environ. Sci 4, no. 1 (2015), 1-10

[38] Ouda, Omar KM, Huseyin M. Cekirge, and Syed AR Raza.  Energy Conversion and Management 75 (2013): 403.

[39] Nizami, A., Mohammad Rehan, Omar KM Ouda, Khurram Shahzad, Yumna Sadef, Tariq Iqbal, and Iqbal MI Ismail. “An            argument for developing waste-to-energy technologies in Saudi Arabia,” 338.

[40] Ouda, Omar KM, Huseyin M. Cekirge, and Syed AR Raza.  Energy Conversion and Management 75 (2013): 405.

[41] Dijkema, G. P. J., M. A. Reuter, and E. V. Verhoef. “A new paradigm for waste management.” Waste management 20, no. 8       (2000): 633-638.

[42] [42] Dijkema, G. P. J., M. A. Reuter, and E. V. Verhoef. “A new paradigm for waste management.” Waste management 20, no. 8   (2000): 633-638.

[43] Cheremisinoff, Nicholas P. Handbook of solid waste management and waste minimization technologies. Butterworth-  Heinemann, 2003.

[44] Schott, Anna Bernstad Saraiva, Henrik Aspegren, Mimmi Bissmont, and Jes la Cour Jansen. Modern Solid Waste Management   in Practice: The City of Malmö Experience. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.

[45] Al-But’hie, Ibrahim M., and Mohammad A. Eben Saleh. “Urban and industrial development planning as an approach for Saudi    Arabia: the case study of Jubail and Yanbu.” Habitat International 26, no. 1 (2002): 1-20.

[46] Abdullah Al-Hadlaq, Zayed Ali Huneitib, and Wamadeva Balachandranc, “Bio-Medical Waste Handling and Management in        Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.” International Journal 4, no. 6 (2013): 76

[47] Troschinetz, Alexis M., and James R. Mihelcic. “Sustainable recycling of municipal solid waste in developing countries.”              Waste management 29, no. 2 (2009): 915-923.

[48] Alhumoud, Jasem M. “Municipal solid waste recycling in the Gulf Co-operation Council states.” Resources, Conservation and    Recycling 45, no. 2 (2005): 142-158.

[49] Alhumoud, Jasem M., Ibrahim Al-Ghusain, and Hamad Al-Hasawi. “Management of recycling in the Gulf Co-operation              Council states.” Waste Management 24, no. 6 (2004): 551-562.

[50] Wilson, David C., Costas A. Velis, and Ljiljana Rodic. “Integrated sustainable waste management in developing countries.” In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 52-68. Thomas Telford, 2013.

[51] Anjum, Muzammil, R. Miandad, M. Waqas, I. Ahmad, Z. O. A. Alafif, A. S. Aburiazaiza, M. A., E. Barakst, and T. Akhtar. “Solid Waste Management in Saudi Arabia,” 20.

[52] Alhumoud, Jasem M. “Municipal solid waste recycling in the Gulf Co-operation Council states,” 148.

[53] Mandeli, Khalid Nasralden. “The realities of integrating physical planning and local management into urban development: A          case study of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.” Habitat International 32, no. 4 (2008): 512-533.

[54], Nizami, A., Mohammad Rehan, Omar KM Ouda, Khurram Shahzad, Yumna Sadef, Tariq Iqbal, and Iqbal MI Ismail. “An           argument for developing waste-to-energy technologies in Saudi Arabia.” Chemical Engineering Transactions 45      (2015b): 337-342.

[55] Khan, Muhammad Sadiq Munfath, and Zakariya Kaneesamkandi. “Biodegradable waste to biogas: renewable energy option          for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” Int. J. Innov. Appl. Stud 4, no. 1 (2013): 101-113.

[56] Abatzoglou, Nicolas, and Steve Boivin. “A review of biogas purification processes.” Biofuels, Bioproducts, and Biorefining 3,     no. 1 (2009): 42-71.

[57] Kjeldsen, Peter, Morton A. Barlaz, Alix P. Rooker, Anders Baun, Anna Ledin, and Thomas H. Christensen. “Present and long-    term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review.” Critical reviews in environmental science and technology 32,          no. 4 (2002): 297-336.

[58] Abatzoglou, Nicolas, and Steve Boivin. “A review of biogas purification processes.”  45.

[59] Ge, Xumeng, Liangcheng Yang, Johnathon P. Sheets, Zhongtang Yu, and Yebo Li. “Biological conversion of methane to             liquid fuels: status and opportunities.” Biotechnology advances 32, no. 8 (2014): 1460-1475.

[60] Esposito, G., L. Frunzo, A. Giordano, F. Liotta, A. Panico, and F. Pirozzi. “Anaerobic co-digestion of organic wastes.” Reviews   in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 11, no. 4 (2012): 325-341.

[61] Panda, Achyut K., Raghubansh K. Singh, and D. K. Mishra. “Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel: A suitable method        for plastic waste management and manufacture of value-added products—A world perspective.” Renewable and           Sustainable Energy Reviews 14, no. 1 (2010): 233-248.

[62], Panda, Achyut K., Raghubansh K. Singh, and D. K. Mishra. “Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel: A suitable method      for plastic waste management and manufacture of value-added products—A world perspective.”  235.

[63] Panda, Achyut K., Raghubansh K. Singh, and D. K. Mishra. “Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel: A suitable method        for plastic waste management and manufacture of value-added products—A world perspective.”  235.

[64] Panda, Achyut K., Raghubansh K. Singh, and D. K. Mishra. “Thermolysis of waste plastics to liquid fuel: A suitable method       for plastic waste management and manufacture of value-added products—A world perspective.”  238.

[65] Jamradloedluk, Jindaporn, and Chaloenporn Lertsatitthanakorn. “Characterization and utilization of char derived from fast             pyrolysis of plastic wastes.” In Advanced Materials Research, vol. 931, pp. 849-853. Trans Tech Publications Ltd,          2014.

[66] Chen, Dezhen, Lijie Yin, Huan Wang, and Pinjing He. “Pyrolysis technologies for municipal solid waste: a review.” Waste management 34, no. 12 (2014): 2466-2486.