Notes on I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud William
The speaker of the I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud is a person sitting on his coach bored in loneliness, thinking about the beauty of nature. Identifying the speaker helped in finding the theme and the massage of the poem. The author of the poem easily identified the speaker. William Wordsworth is one of the poets highly known for his focus on human interaction with nature and its impacts on the human mind. Besides, William Wordsworth is also known for his close attraction in the beauty of nature and environmental conservation, with most of his poetic works revolving around such themes.
From the analysis of the poet’s tone, it is clear that the speaker has a positive attitude towards the subject of the poem. The poem, besides starting with sad tone progress entirely jovial mood as the author narrates the beauty of nature at his scenes. Besides, the change in mood helped understand and emphasize the positive attitude that the author has towards the environment. Also, the author has highly used figurative languages such as imagery and alliteration in conjunction with specific figures of speech to bring about the mood and the tone. The metaphors and similes have also been employed in this poem to emphasis on some aspects that the author wanted to pass across. Besides, they help in creating a clear image of the real scene of the beauty of nature as per the author.
Diction is another poetic aspect that the author has employed in depicting the mood of the poem. Through diction, the author has created a joyful tone and sentimental somber tone found in the poem. The syntax using 4 stanzas three lines in each helps in creating the rhythmic flow of the poem. Besides, the author uses a narrative poem to describe his vision of nature from one perceptive to the other. He might have written this poem thus to emphasis on environmental conservation. The language of the poem reveals that the poem was written for a general reader. However, the author has structured this poem in such a way that there is no diversity in how people could interpret it from a different critical perspective.