This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Uncategorized

Pope’s case of Obscenity

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

Pope’s case of Obscenity

In Pope v. Illinois (1987), the United States Supreme Court was given a duty to determine whether an allegedly obscene material severe implications for science, arts, politics, and literature. In an obscenity case of Miller v. California (1973), the U.S. Supreme Court, had laid out a test against which the Obscenity of any material can be determined (Marshall, 2020). The most prominent of the three provisions was that the First Amendment would only protect works that lack significant literary, artistic, scientific, and political value. In this regard, if a given work under scrutiny lacks the four attributes, then it enjoys the protection of the Supreme Court. Besides that, an average American person using contemporary standards of the community should find the work in question to be appealing to the prurient interest. Additionally, if the work, as defined by the applicable state law, uses a patently offensive approach to depict sexual conduct or excretory functions, then the Supreme law will not protect it..

Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page

However, in Pope v. Illinois (1987) decision, the trial court found Pope guilty for violating the state criminal statute prohibiting the sale of an obscene magazine (Marshall, 2020). However, when the Pope appealed his case, the Supreme Court found out that the Illinois court had improperly relied on the community standards in defining that the sold magazine had some social value. According to Justice Stevens, who presided over the case, there is a challenge with the former formulations on how to determine the Obscenity of a material that can be determined. He claimed that the community or the said “reasonable” persons might not be relied upon to conclude that a given work is obscene. In this regard, therefore, the question of Obscenity should remain as laid down in the First Amendment, and the jury should use his/her interpretation of the policy concerning American communities to establish if a material is obscene.

 

 

Works Cited

Marshall, R. (2020). Obscenity Case Files: Pope v. Illinois | Comic Book Legal Defense Fund. Retrieved 22 March 2020, from http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/obscenity-case-files/obscenity-case-files-pope-v-illinois/

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask