Reaction to the article by Wilson and Kelling (Broken Windows)
After critically reading the article, I have a strong feeling that it is very informative, not forgetting being educative. For instance, the piece is professionally written. Indeed, the authors of the article are very conversant with the issue of police and public safety. Notably, Wilson and Kelling stipulate well-thought arguments that are supported by evidence. Findings of intensive research studies also support the provisions of this particular article. I feel that the suggestions provided in the article should be implemented in the police department to increase safety.
Firstly, I agree with Wilson and Kelling that foot patrol significantly reduces the overall mobility of security officers (Wilson & Kelling 1982). It is indeed difficult for officers in the foot patrols to respond swiftly to security alarms and emergencies. A large number of security guards indeed dislike foot patrols following the numerous hardships associated with it.
Secondly, I agree with the two authors that there exists a solid relationship between disorder and crime in society. For instance, disorder and crime have an inseparable bond. A disorderly community is more likely to have relatively many criminal cases when compared to a community that maintains order. However, I’m afraid I have to disagree with the authors on the idea that individuals will avoid their colleagues while responding to fear that may end up weakening controls. Indeed, in cases of fear, people tend to come together and synergistically come up with viable solutions on how to curb such fears thus helping police officers to strengthen the community and police officers to strengthen their controls.
Reference
Wilson, J. Q & Kelling. G. L (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling. Criminological perspectives: essential readings, 400.