Resilience Among Older Adolescents in Foster Care

Resilience Among Older Adolescents in Foster Care

The article establishes the phenomenon of resilience that is exhibited among adults, especially in foster care homes. It further seeks to explore to analyze the data of a sample of 351 older adolescents to establish the findings associated with resilience in society (Shpiegel, 2015). Therefore, resilience is measured through consideration of certain factors, including; teen pregnancy avoidance, mental illness, criminal activities developing, lack of housing leading to homelessness, substance use, and education attainment. The study established that lower resilience levels were associated with sexual abuse histories, physical abuse, delinquency, and instability in the placement among children. However, individuals that belonged to the community of Non-whites had higher resilience levels as compared to whites. Moreover, the insights from the finding revealed that the move to control risk factors among non-whites had less impact on the higher resilience.

The article presents demographic variables that are measured in terms of gender and race. On personal insights, it is worth ascertaining that the measures provide a limited means to determine resilience among adults. It broadly focuses on whites and non-blacks. It is also correct to indicate the findings of the study are not appropriate. It demonstrates the risk factors that are associated with resilience in the foster homes. The fact that higher levels of resilience are portrayed among the six domains (Shpiegel, 2015). Therefore, on personal insights, the views developed by the author of the article are not appropriate.  Moreover, the aspects of the sample size that is used by the author are not correct based on the research. Hence, it can be indicated that the author manipulates cross-sectional analysis and designs rather than longitudinal designs. On personal insights, it would be appropriate to make use of longitudinal designs.

Moreover, it is worth indicating that the findings developed by the article in terms of resilience among older adults are correct. It is right to reveal that interventions can be implemented to prevent the extreme effects of resilience among adolescents. The article is further correct to build on the risk protection strategies that are employed towards developing findings on resilience. Moreover, it is right for the report to reveal the differences that are brought out through the gender and race-based on the domains. For instance, the non-whites are associated with wither higher resilience in society. It is appropriate for the argument as their existing issues of racial discrimination that are possibly portrayed to affect them. In terms of the educational attainment and homelessness, the effect of race is described to reveal higher resilience among older adolescents..

The information about the article can be associated with the challenge of data analysis and measurements. The methodology of the article involves a cross-sectional analysis of the data set that is used to build on the findings developed. Hence, it is correct to indicate that data collection used results in incomplete and biased information. The chi-square tests and t-tests used in the analysis of the data can further be portrayed to use be employed appropriately. However, the biases are likely to arise from the use of data collected on gender and race as demographic factors that are outdated. The SPSS version used in the analysis can also be portrayed not to be up to date (Shpiegel, 2015). Therefore, the biases and incomplete data that are used in the study might result in the development of wrong findings.

The author of the article is motivated to discover the complexities barring the performance in the lifestyles based on the six domains that are analyzed. Moreover, the author has the objective to determine the risk factors that are associated with resilience in society. Hence, it can be depicted that the author seeks to understand the relationship that exists between the risk factors and the six domains in relation to resilience. The author is also motivated to establish a survey on the conditions that are experienced in foster care homes. For instance, increase teen pregnancies, substance abuse, sexual assaults, and homelessness.

The author is qualified to initiate writing the article based on the research topic and the resources used. It can be established that resilience is portrayed among the foster care homes to discover the effect of the risk and factors of protection. The sample population used in the study further enables the author to have a better understanding of the risk and protective factors. However, the existence of extreme cases of the complexities among the six domains that are experienced among older adolescents.

However, the topic seems to contradict explicitly on the issues of gender and race-based on the resilience degrees. It is indicated that youths belonging to the non-white have higher degrees of resilience levels. Moreover, it is developed that a regression model that is used in the protective factors was discovered to be statistically insignificant. It is also apparent to create that the contradicting information exists in the use of gender analyses in the regression model. In the final model, gender is portrayed to be insignificant, while in the rest of the models, it is significant.

References

Shpiegel, S. (2015). Resilience Among Older Adolescentsin Foster Care: The Impact of

Risk andProtective Factors. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,

Vol 13(4). Pp. 1-19.