scholarly work by Jamil Jreisat, considering his critical articulations relating to comparative public administration
Comparative public administration, which is associated with the adoption of relative fashion in the study of administrative systems, is considered when analyzing the political, cultural, social, and economic contexts of various nations. Such an approach objectively aims to give an insight into a state’s administrative behavior towards influencing genuineness as far as public administration is concerned. The paper reflects on the scholarly work by Jamil Jreisat, considering his critical articulations relating to comparative public administration.
First, the article gives an in-depth analysis about the concept of comparative public administration and its application in the field of leadership. Notably, the scholar analyzes the transformed nature of society and how cross-cultural studies can facilitate individuals’ performance in the ever-changing world (Jreisat, 2005). The article points out the contribution made by the CPA towards enabling individuals and institutions to realize positive transformations as far as public administration is concerned.
Secondly, the article reflects on the contribution of the comparative approach. According to the author, the analysis of administration across the country’s boundaries improved individuals’ knowledge about the construction of Typologies, the formulation of unique administrative patterns, and enabled administrators to advance growth administration (Jreisat, 2005). Similarly, the scholar points out some of the critiques of the use of such an approach. One of the significant critiques noted is that the approach lacks synthesis. Similarly, this approach is critiqued as a failed concept in delivering the promised outcomes.
In summary, the article reflects on the significant concepts associated with the utilization of comparative public administration approach in enhancing leadership. According to the article, a comparative approach considers diverse nation’s social, political, economic, and cultural contexts towards giving the best measures in enhancing public administration. Furthermore, the scholar points on the critiques of this approach considering its inability to deliver the promised fruits as far as the administration is concerned.
References
Jreisat, J. E. (2005). Comparative public administration is back in, prudently. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 231-242.