This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Uncategorized

Search and Seizure

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

Search and Seizure

  1. The Intent and Fundamental Concepts of Search and Seizure Law as it Applies to Digital Crime

The Fourth Amendment and statutory privacy laws guide the way the police should conduct a search and seizure. For example, the Fourth Amendment restricts arbitrary searches and seizure of computers and their data. The law also monitors the scope of search and seizure, as well as the process to follow. As per the Fourth Amendment, the law enforcers should only perform these activities after obtaining a warrant unless in exceptional instances (“Search and seizure,” n.d.). Accordingly, the law has four concepts. The first is the issuance of the warrant using a neutral magistrate, who should be disinterested and detached from the issue (“Search and seizure,” n.d.). The second is that a probable cause should be established for the warrant based on facts. The third element is that a law enforcement officer should fill the warrant in good faith. The last is particularity, where the warrant should state expressly what the law enforcers should seize. Overall, the law guides on how to conduct search and seizure.

  1. Situations Where Search and Seizure is Possible Without a Warrant and Limitations

Several circumstances warrant search and seizure without a warrant. The first circumstance is consent, where the individual voluntarily allows agents to search his or her computer. Notably, the consent can be implicit, explicit, apparent, or actual (Jarrett & Baille, 2015). Another instant for warrant exception is exigent circumstances, which entail evidence being in imminent danger of destruction, the police or public facing danger because of the threat, police pursuing the criminal, and the likelihood of the suspect escaping (Jarrett & Baille, 2015). The third situation is a search incident to a lawful arrest whereby an officer can thoroughly search a suspect or their surroundings following an arrest. Border searches and plain view evidence equally do not require a warrant. However, warrantless searches have limitations, such as the inability to use proof obtained illegally to find other evidence (Jarrett & Baille, 2015). Officers also need reasonable suspicion that a person is involved in criminal activity before searching them. Again, cars are barred from searches unless the police officer has an inkling that the vehicle contains evidence of a crime. Search and seizure are possible without a warrant but have limitations.

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask