Seniority and teachers in a company
I prefer seniority since it rewards with loyalty to the teacher. The company believes that the members have been loyal to it, so they should also reciprocate. This makes the teacher feel a sense of their employer, and this makes it better than merit. Keeping experience, teachers who have worked for a long time are likely to be more experienced than those who are new. Still, even the new workers can bring new ideas in school since they may be having exposure to modern technology, and this may be about innovation. Salaries, in seniority layoffs, are supposed to be from the top of the issue in the company is the budget woes since trimming the lower-paid teacher would not help in the solving of the problem.
As the human resource manager, I would prefer the use of computer networks in communication between departments using desktops as well as laptops. For personal correspondence, they can use mobile devices, which would include smartphones and computer tablets. I prefer the use of the English language for official communication for departmental communications since everyone will be in a position to understand.
S, which protects the discrimination of teachers from other WARN Act of 1988, is a labor law in the US whose duty is to protect employees, community, and employees’ families. The law requires employers who have more than one hundred employees to give a 60 days notification if they want to close the plant as well as if they’re going to layoff many employees at ago. In the year 2001, 2000, the firm closed, and this affected 660,000 employees. The plants were supposed to have notified the employees of the closure so that the employees could look for another place to work. Employees are supposed to be warned; these include the supervisors, managers, salaried workers, and hourly wages.