Zero Carbon Bill in Relation to Learning Partnership to Improve Community Outcomes
Zero Carbon Bill puts in place targets to reduce all greenhouse gases. As it stands, the governments’ implements Zero Carbon Bill so that by 2050 nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide will be net-zero. Also, Methane has a 2030 target to decrease emissions by 10% and a reduction provision target of 24-47% by 2050.
New Zealand Zero Carbon Bill focuses on reducing emissions produced by diary nutrition factories which are 22.5% at the moment. For them, farmers should develop a farm-particular plan to manage and reduce emissions via farm management improvements. It, therefore, needs to be managed alongside extensive environmental issues such as quality of water, erosion control and biodiversity (Attia, 2018). The farmers are expected to calculate on-farm emissions, come up with a management plan to reduce the emission and keep an eye to the future technologies that reduce emissions.
According to Davis, et al., (2018), Zero Carbon Bill in conjunction to Climate Change Commission organization partner together to leverage learning that aim at reducing carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide to 10%. From the yearly reviews of targets on New Zealand Zero Carbon Bill, its government other than Climate Change Commission Organization has partnered with other sectors such as transportation sector to provide education on various strategies that can be used to reduce emissions Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Technological Process Approaches that improve Community Outcomes
Performance-Based Low Carbon Building Technology screening approach
It can be applied in different building functions, and climate conditions as low carbon technology is selected on the aspects of the three-step plan. They include be lean, be clean and be green, advances physics tools are incorporated to utilize the essence Performance-Based Low Carbon Building Technology Screening improves community outcome (Davis et al., 2018). Boomed low carbon technologies such as renewable technologies are applied in building technology in addition to carbon capping and carbon footprint technology.
Carbon renewal technological approach
As buildings produce 40%-50% of global carbon emission, legislative low carbon performance requirements which aim at reducing emissions. Carbon renewal technical approach also can improve community outcomes. Eastman’s carbon renewal technology tends to use plastics waste as feedstock (Attia, 2018). They convert it back to ordinary and versatile molecular components. The process tends to recycle several complex plastic disposals as well as mixed plastics which can’t be recovered by conventional recycling technologies. In short, the new recycling can flexible packaging and plastic films which are later diverted to landfills preventing emissions and improving community outcomes.
Adaptive Systems for enhanced Industry
Energy Technology Innovation; a System Approach for Building Industry
To capture multiple sites of investments such as Building Industry, policies and actors involved can take iterative innovation stages. As suggested by the scholars, employing Energy Technology Innovation System Approach, its assessment based on qualitative and quantitative analysis (Munir & Kok, 2019). With rampant cases of greenhouse gas emissions, incorporating suitable energy technological innovation necessitates policy designs which focus on clean energy. Application of ETIS Theory, for instance, denotes GHG emission performance while involving government performance.
Measuring Carbon Footprint and Carbon Capping Adaptive Technique
The carbon footprint is essential in its initiate’s minor policy transformations and primarily measured using undertaking greenhouse gas emission assessment. Thus, once the carbon footprint size is noted, one can devise a strategy to reduce emissions using technological development, changed green private or public procurement (GPP), consumption, and carbon capture, among others.
Carbon captive or emission trading system at times known as cap-and-trade- policies can be applied to put a limitation of carbon dioxide emission (Munir & Kok, 2019). Students taking internships in such industries can understand the carbon captive process in its ability to save the environments. They can also learn the government entity sets such as “cap” on the various forms of emission which might be generated from its jurisdiction.
Collaborative Learner Outcomes
As it incorporates employability, internships and work-based learning techniques, they are essential in Zero Carbon Bill education. Combining the three has improved community outcomes as groups are taught on various adaptive systems for the enhanced industry like carbon footprint and carbon capping. Additionally, they tend to understand the different adverse effects of emission, especially to climate (Davis et al., 2018). Carbon renewal technology, chemical recycling technique in addition to other innovation recycling solution is analyzed. In the long run, individuals present tend to understand the concepts of Zero Carbon Bill, organizations partnering to leverage learning and well as building themselves as individuals.
Evaluation and Analysis of Global Data and Information on Emissions and Trends on Zero Carbon Bill Decisions
Carbon dioxide accounts for 76% of the total greenhouse gas emissions. Methane profoundly from agriculture contributes to 16% of greenhouse emissions. Nitrous Oxide totals to 6% majorly from industries. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions stated that Carbon Dioxide and Greenhouse gas emission worldwide increases the world temperature to one degree Celsius which has diverse outcomes. Its impact is witnessed by extreme weather conditions such as storms, droughts, floods and heatwaves.
Trends presented shows that ecological, health and physical impact of emissions has even disrupted water system flows. The Zero Carbon Bill, as initiated by the United Nations, urges countries to come with alternative methods to change the climate (Munir & Kok, 2019). Trends show that UN has been forced to work in relation to Zero Carbon Bill of Paris Agreement to limit average warming to 2 degree Celsius as carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere are now over 400ppm over 800,000 years. Globally, for instance, human beings emit thirty-six billion tonnes of carbon dioxide. In countries additionally, there is more than 100 fold per capita of carbon dioxide emissions with the USA, China, Russia and Japan having 25%, 13%, 6% and 4% respectively.
References
Attia, S. (2018). Net Zero Energy Buildings (NZEB): Concepts, frameworks and roadmap for project analysis and implementation. Butterworth-Heinemann. Pan, W., & Li, K. (2016). Clusters and exemplars of buildings towards zero carbon. Building and Environment, 104, 92-101.
Davis, S. J., Lewis, N. S., Shaner, M., Aggarwal, S., Arent, D., Azevedo, I. L., … & Clack, C. T. (2018). Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science, 360(6396), eaas9793.
Di Filippo, J., Karpman, J., & DeShazo, J. R. (2019). The impacts of policies to reduce CO2 emissions within the concrete supply chain. Cement and Concrete Composites, 101, 67-82.
Munir, Q., & Kok, S. C. (2019). Greenhouse Gas, Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from Threshold Effect. In Climate Change and Global Development (pp. 59-81). Springer, Cham.