Responses to Annotated Bibliography
Student 1
Hello Michelle. I have to appreciate how you have structured your work, highlighting key concepts regarding the source you are delving on. I would add that in summary should entail an overview of strong points that the article or the source requires. It is more of a synopsis of the story and involves highlighting key concepts that the article or the source espouses (Rieh & Hilligoss, 2008). Though you have highlighted various aspects related to the article, I believe that there could have been a better way to highlight the points in a relatively concise manner. The credibility of an article is reflected in the author and the number of instances it has undergone peer-reviews. However, your discussion has addressed essential aspects that characterize an annotated bibliography.
Reference
Rieh, S. Y., & Hilligoss, B. (2008). College students’ credibility judgments in the information-seeking process. Digital media, youth, and credibility, 49-72.
Student 2
Hello Ivan. Honestly, the way you have structured summary, credibility, and assessment is on point and gives one a clear insight one what every component concerning the article. The summary part provides a reader with an insight into what the article entails. It does not involve an elaborate description of what it includes but is highlights various instances that are prominent in the item you are using as a point of reference. On the other hand, I would add that the credibility of an article or any other publication goes beyond the position of the author. Andy Coghlan could have been a renowned writer and has published several articles and journals since 1956. However, the credibility of the article would rely on peer reviews, and the relevance of the information to the contemporary world (Sorenson, 2016). In that regard, the article must be not later than five years. In your case, the article is two years old, making it relevant, hence credible. Your assessment also agrees with the above assertions.
Reference
Sorenson, M. E. (2016). Beyond the Google search bar: Evaluating source credibility in contemporary research. Communication teacher, 30(2), 82-86.