Gun laws effect on the development
Introduction
Development refers to the process through which a nation works its way up the ladder both in the aspect of economic, political, social and sovereignty performance which in the end leads to the improvement of the citizen’s living standards, sustainability, and equality that does differentiate them for the developing countries (Lemieux et al., 59). The point which the developing nation be countries do get to the end of being termed developed comes down to a judgments call and statistical in the sand that is often based on the combination of all these factors above. According to the definition of the United Nations development programs UNDP, annual human development report HDR, development is the expansion of the people’s level of freedom and the capacities which result in the people leading the life that they value and have no specific reason to values. It is all about expanding the choices. According to this definition, freedom and capabilities are the more expansive kind of nations that the human everyday basic needs but rather key elements of fulfilling their lives. Gun laws have also been cited to be one element which impacts on a country’s development in various ways. The report examines the impacts of gun laws on a country’s development.
Impact of gun laws on development
Gun violence is particularly of higher prevalence in America, where there is the ease of access to a firearm and weak gun laws that regulate the use of these fire. America is the region in the whole world rate of development that has been affected by the poor gun laws implementation. It is estimated that out of 100,000 people, 5 of them are likely to die from gun-related violence. This is relatively higher than the prevalence in war-torn nations, Yemen or Syria (Omar García-Ponce et al., 60). The rate of development in the US has drastically reduced compared to its inception as a result of the poor implementation of gun laws. In Latin America, on the other hand, corruption, organized crime, and the dysfunctional law enforcement system have even fuels this level of violent crime furthers (Omar García-Ponce et al., 67).
According to various researches conducted on the element of development, Political stability often emerges to be one common factor that promotes growth. Progress relies on how peaceful a country is and on how people have the capability of being involved in their daily activities. According to these studies, a nation which does enjoy stability in terms of political aspect are better placed to develop. Most developed nations have, over the longest time, enjoyed political stability. Developed countries such as the USA, Canada, and most European countries did have the effective Gun control laws for a long time have been prohibiting the illegal use of the gun or the unlawful ownership of the firearms (Lemieux et al., 19). Some of the nations, especially in European countries such as Spain and German, have had zero tolerance for unlawful or civilians ownership of guns. As a result of the government have experienced reduced violence related to gun ownership and as such, have experienced robust development in all aspect of life(Omar García-Ponce et al., 159). Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
The development of a country relies on the freedom of the people or the citizens of a given nation to be able to transact in their daily activities without the fear of any violence. Gun violence is, however, a factor of the gun laws globally. A nation that has ineffective Gun control laws do experience increased frequency of gun violence, which hurts the country’s development as a result of the abuse or wars which are stimulated by such ineffective or weak gun control laws. Countries like Yemen and Syria, which have experienced civil wars over some time and have experienced a declining level of development, can be attributed to the weak or ineffective gun control was that such a nation has in place. Progress in such society which have experienced long-time violence does experience such states of underdevelopment as a result of the weak gun laws which are not strong enough do prevent the firearms ownership by the civilian(Chapman et al., 21).
Typically, “surges” do occur when gun violence sharply increases and suddenly. In most areas where gun violence surges do occur, the cities do experience a significant reduction in the level of growth of the new retails business that leads to fewer or no jobs to the people and fewer local establishments in such regions. The value of assets, such as houses, do appreciate sharply and become more unaffordable. The result of this is unfortunate, an underdeveloped community. In weak nations, for example, violence is considered one of the significant contributing factors to this situation, most people do are barred from involving in various business activities as a result of the force. A survey of a significant underdeveloped nation in the world does reveal that Crime is the leading cause of lower levels of development (Mekawi, 38).
Countries that have weak laws governing Gun ownership, such as the USA in recent days, have had vulnerable gun control laws impacting the levels of the country’s economic development. In the US, gun control laws have not been able to prevent the violence that comes up in almost all corners of the country daily. The development of the common regions of these gun violence, such as Compton in the USA, have lagged. Violence crime as a result of the weak gun control laws has significantly affected the development of the USA by impacting directly and indirectly on the housing prices, and neighborhood business activities. Most people are not able to operate their business freely, and this is impacting negatively on the country’s development. A study in 2006 in the various neighbored in the USA’s most gun violent areas did reveal that the extreme as a result of the gun control laws have negatively affected the housing values across all these neighborhoods (Omar García-Ponce et al., 171). The effect, according to this research, indicates that low-income neighborhood is the most affected by gun violence.
Another study in 2009 did provide a piece of further evidence on the impact of gun control on US development. It did provide evidence that the higher rate of violent crime that has been witnessed in the various parts of the US as a result of weak Gun control laws have increased the numbers of homes sales in only ethnically homogenous places this has resulted in a lower state of development in such neighborhoods. According to an earlier study on the violence levels, increased levels of gun violence have the most significant impact on the growth of service resulted in sectors of a country’s economy. In Syria, for example, various service industries such as the tourism and hospitality industry that can contribute to the country’s economy have been affected by the civilian crime that has been witnessed in such nations. Politically unstable governments have experienced the reduced levels of economic, social, and political elements of development owing to the same gun control laws, which make it impossible for a community to access finances and other factors of development (Mekawi, 69).
The growth of economic is the backbone of any development of a country. Growth relies on the business operation and the development of infrastructure of a nation. Gun laws affect the critical element of the economy, such as education, business, and health. Compared to the past, the modern-day US, for example, has been faced with numerous cases public shootings as a result of the weak gun laws, which pose a significant threat to the country’s population. More comprehensive access to a gun by the vulnerable gun laws in the country do result in the death of more than 39000 people every year. Each day, Over 360 people are shot every day in the US and survive. This is a big blow to the country’s development in many aspects. The higher statistics of the USA death rate as a result of gun-related crime impacts significantly on the country’s level of development (Lemieux et al., 94).
Generally, a nation with weak gun laws has a low level of development in most developing countries, especially in African and Asia, where war is most experienced. The ownership of the firearms by civils is a show of power in the hands of the people. With the gun laws unable to stop the firearms getting in the hands of the civilians, the level of development is hampered by the lower level of business activities as a result of the lack of political stability that the civilians pose. Countries such as Liberia and Somalia in Africa, which have in the past have experienced Civil wars for over a most extended period, have required the least in terms of development. Such a nation has had this level of low development, a result of the inability of its citizens to conduct their daily business operations (Chapman et al., 32).
Before the gun control laws
The gun laws were introduced by the various nationalities in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This followed the increase in the crime rate, which resulted from the rise in the numbers of firearms in most of the countries across the globe. Some states did come up with excellent and reasonable gun laws that positively impacted the violent crime rate in such nations. Most of the European countries such as German, Italy, Spain, and the UK have undoubtedly gained from these gun laws with the governments managing to retrieve and control the guns previously owned by the civilian. The rules have also ensured that most of the firm arms are owned by government agencies such as the military and the policy with few owned by Civilians keenly monitored and are all registered. However, countries which did encourage the ownership of firearms by Civilians such as the USA have had a problem controlling the use of these arms, and this has seen the crime rate increased in such nation impacting negatively on their development
Compared to the inception of most nations that have had their development level affected by gun laws, most of the countries did have a steady increase in growth. The development of the USA before violent crime as a result of the unfortunate gun control acts did experience a fast and stable growth, which is estimated to be at over 5% annually. This has reduced drastically as a result of the gun laws which promote violence in the country. People have not been able in the recent day to operate freely in the country as compared to the 1970s, where the gun violent crime rate was relatively shallow. The gun law in the nation is estimated to have affected the countries rate of development by close to 1%. This impact is very significant (Omar García-Ponce et al., 189).
Other than the USA, other nations, especially the developing countries, have which have experienced civil wars as a result of the gun laws that did have gradual growth of their economy and social development before such conflicts. Syrian, which one of the worse affected nations by the civilian wars as a result of the firearms being in hand of the civilian, did have one of the robust development? From the time of inception of countries such as Yemen, the level of development was considerably fast before the country’s civilian acquired guns. The control of the country’s political power, which has been on the hands of the Civilian as a result of the robust gun laws in the country can be considered the leading cause of the reduced; level of development that this country is currently experiencing (Chapman et al., 38).
Most of the countries across Asia and Africa have demonstrated that weak gun laws are the leading cause of underdevelopment, which is witnessed in these nations. Despite being in a region of the world, which is oil-rich, Yemen and Iraq remain very underdeveloped as a result of the gun laws which allow a civilian to own and indiscriminately use the firearms. From inception, these countries did experience some of the best rates of development t compared to the recent day where the gun laws have been flouted. Most of these nations have experienced a reduced price of development in the contemporary day as compared to their inception as a result of the city was ignited by the faulty and weak Gun law (Mekawi, 69).
Conclusion
Gun laws have been one of the most controversial proposals in most countries across the world. However, the element of development and underdevelopment can be attributed to the component of a nation’s gun laws. Different countries around the globe have ever succeeded or remained underdeveloped as a result of these Gun laws. One of the most prominent cases under study is the USA. Compared to its inception, the USA has been the most successful in terms of political stability and hence, the element of development in almost also aspect. However, in recent days the country has in the suffered reduced rate of growth due to the gun control laws which have failed in ensuring that the guns are in the hand of the right people. The result of this is a country that is full of violent crime as a result of the Civilians possessing and using guns for the wrong reasons. Gun laws have significant affecting on global development.
Work cited
Chapman, Simon, Philip Alpers, and Michael Jones. “Association between gun law reforms and intentional firearm deaths in Australia, 1979-2013.” Jama 316.3 (2016): 291-299.
Cukier, Wendy, and Sarah Allen Eagen. “Gun violence.” Current opinion in psychology 19 (2018): 109-112.
Dube, Arindrajit, Oeindrila Dube, and Omar García-Ponce. “Cross-border spillover: US gun laws and violence in Mexico.” American Political Science Review 107.3 (2013): 397-417.
Gerstein, Neal S., et al. “The gun violence epidemic: time for perioperative physicians to act.” Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 32.3 (2018): 1097-1100.
LAWS, GUN. “Gun Control.”
Lemieux, Frederic. “Effect of Gun Culture and Firearm Laws on Gun Violence and Mass Shootings in the United States: A Multi-Level Quantitative Analysis.” International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 9.1 (2014).
Malawi, Yara, and Konrad Bresin. “Is the evidence from racial bias shooting task studies a smoking gun? Results from a meta-analysis.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 61 (2015): 120-130.