Ficto-Criticism

Ficto-Criticism

Fiction-criticism is a type of research that is available to be accessed by the reader, and its access is more common than it’s standard as an academic test.  The writer uses another medium to present their views and understand a particular subject; they use the theoretical concepts of a question and try to apply them to the situation they want to explain. At that concept, the writer presents their own subject –position, their interests, personal sensibilities, and potential biases.  In this field, there involves two arguments; creative work and creatively practical.  The original work generates detectable outputs, while artistic practice leads to research insight, which is later made and written down. The subject uses approaches when producing an experimental text, which consists of still frames from the original footage of video from the Kerb.

Ulin 2011, who is an archeologist, uses an auto-archeology approach in her piece of work. She employs creative writing elements, which include sub-sections, which is a combination of poetry and original writing data presentation.  When reading a part of work one needs to re-read the work as well as play an excellent attention to the literary devices which are used by the author including the structure as well as the timeline included in the text, the voice of the author, characters in the writing, art, poetry, imageries, uses of styles like punctuation, italics, and fonts.

We are presenting a film of video of a beautiful some pictures that are made to appear like the sky by the use of technology of different shapes and sizes for our presentation. Have suitable environments are an excellent presentation of archeological films. The presentability of the films depends on the nature of the unsettling camera, the art and architecture are used to create films of urban images, create a great city as well as Halsted street. In the past the technology was of low quality and the cameras could produce pictures which were of low quality, so the presentability of the film was not very attractive as compared to those produced today. Today the movie presented can be stored in motion, which is called video installation since the technology is brilliant.

With the view of UTM trails, then we get the concept of different viewers and different. Readers.People think differently when two different people read the same piece of work they get different information that why it is good to listen to the people on their views and compare to what one thing the work means.  Different people take separate paragraphs with varying levels of a wait since they have different experiences with the piece of work. There is no single day that two people will have the same full reading, and this gives a good reason as to why archaeology should be practiced. When one looks at the different pictures at the UTM trails, they see different things.

People could differ in the interpretation of the paintings from the UTM trail, they show to give their different views and come to a common point, and they don’t get a central answer they should compromise to keep everyone pleased. Collaboration is very vital since it will help people to perceive things differently and cooperate on different ideas to improve everyone’s views on the same subject for the need of contemporary archeology. In a given piece of work after a person reads it, there is a need to re-read as well as re-interpret the work for them to get the contemporary archeology importance in their life on the grounds of social, cultural, and historical elements.  The trails are 19.3 km, and they are in circular, they help to connect routes in an integrated part of a natural ecosystem within the UTM. The pathways are used by adrenaline seekers, for those who love sports, horse riding, and cyclists.

The Beautiful natural aura has curves where people go to enjoy vigorous activities in a relaxed environment that looks like snows. The place seems immersed with a beautiful flower that could attract people from distant places to come to a visit to the site. We can all be archeologists if we choose to think of our subject matter, or our way of examining it, in this way ”.When we view the pictures, we can give different information about the same paintings. The understanding mode is both a quiet mood as well as sensation, and history is not only sensational but also non-sense numbness. Historical sense is both phantoms as well as full, and it is when one is unable to sense history or even know it. According to Harrison, the one studying archaeology realizes the more he tries to get new knowledge, then the meaning of archaeology reduces continuously. Archaeologies contributes to the understanding of day to day needs in contemporary society when they meditate on the recent past after a meditation.

According to Piccini, the paints are in the form of films that uses certain subjects such as geographical presentations, which present a wound with an organic-like dead description that gives a beautiful environment in a movie or an architecture. With the media archeology which is used to produce films with different background of painting films, people can unpack hidden that are there between architectural structures, information technology used to create the movie and mechanical observations in structural.  There is the use of aerial rides as well as new images like the images presented in UTM  trials where the technology is used to create different pictures of beautiful trees with a relaxed environment.  The uses of media archeology increase aero-visual predominance to our society and culture. If there are things that affected our past, we should accept the reality and try to avoid anything that blurs our archeology using our personal lives.  We are supposed to observe and understand the materials used by the past people and try to understand how the same object does to our present life, and through we will get the need to consider the motive as we reflect on the potential that is stored in the used things.

For a person to become an archeologist, they need to carry out archeological research by experimenting with subjects, Like the pictures on the film where the backgrounds are formed using films that can be viewed in the form of a video.  Archeological research involves three approaches. It starts with historian approaches, takes an examination in the past to know how archeologists approached a particular topic. The person further investigations on the urban explorer; this is how the people in urban viewed the same subject under research and, lastly, did their research on the topic then create awareness of the issue.

A person can use the past written document to predict the future using the archeological perspective of situations. When a film is used in the work of literature, one should meditate on the time, futurity, and duration as well as humanity, which led to the drawing of attention to that which seems impossible since one can predict the future inhibition of the world. Into Eternity is describes as “nothing less than post-human architecture ” (Smith and Roger, 2009). An archeologist is concerned with the film’s what the film entails. Madsen looks at the future exhibition, questioning his feels and tries to understand if the film is interested in solving the communication problems concerning repository that have vast times paces unimaginably.

Archaeologists should try to understand what they share, how they differ, and the common ground so that they can solve issues with each other and speak of a common problem at the end of the day. With the uses of Into Eternity, they can invite questions of their imaginations as well as to communicate with other unknown archeologists so that they can realize what they share and what is not yet recognized. From the film,  the views can see the similarities and the differences between different images there some films have green backgrounds, which shows a tremendous green environment with grass. In contrast, others don’t have them, but some buildings look alike. Some trees are dry while others are flourishing; these are the differences the viewers should observe. The archeologists don’t criticize a piece of work; instead, it helps to adopt and critically reflect the film with archeological concern. The archeology concern involves familiar as well as unfamiliar interrogations when all factors are a concern or when overlooking issues and infra-ordinary issues. Different methods are used to take the views, and the mythologies used usually alienates the characters from the normality of discourse.

In conclusion, the presentation of the films is perfect in the presence of technology, which enables the production of architectural work in the form of a movie.  The camera presentation is very clear, and one can view the films. The upcoming technology has improved; there is a need for individuals to share their views on different pieces of work they have read since no one can have the same opinion as another person. The viewer needs to observe, and if differences arise then, the two parties must agree or compromised to take the views of another person. They need to satisfy the wants of the other person comes with the agreement of each other’s perspective. Even the archeologists differ from each other, but they set laws were they come to the same point and agree with each other on matters concerning life and their perspective towards literature, films, life in general. Everyone can be an archeologist; what they need to do is choose a piece of work and give a critical view and thinking of the same.

References

In Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts, edited by Smith, Hazel and

Practice in the Creative Arts, written by Smith, Hazel, and Roger T. Dean, pp 1-40. Edinburgh

Roger T. Dean, pp 41-65. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Smith, Hazel, and Roger T. Dean, 2009 Introduction. In Practice-led Research, Research-led

Sullivan, Graeme 2009 Chapter 2: Making Space: The Purpose and Place of Practice-led Research.

University Press, Edinburgh.